Posts

Showing posts from October, 2012

OBAMA'S BENGHAZI DISQUALIFIER -- NO OTHER NEEDED TO VOTE HIM OUT

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mg-e71IDAUw&feature=player_embedded

I have written about many questionable events and failed policies that show President Obama and those in his administration are not qualified either by experience, or by action, to govern the United States of America. All are serious displays if incompetence, but none are more egregious than the dereliction of duty in dealing with the massacre of 4 Americans in Benghazi, Libya. While the major news outlets are covering up the facts of this disaster until after the election Nov. 6, as previously reported, there is enough news available from various sources for Americans to learn the truth. And, the truth is damning, not only for agencies such as State, but for President Obama himself. Even DOD Secretary Panetta is pathetic in his commentary! Even Gen. David Patreus' actions are not clear. What does seem clear now is that Predident Obama and his staff knew in real time what was happening and ignored it. Obama ev…

MEDIA DISHONESTY -- THE WP, RICHARD COHEN

I have recently written, with concern about the Libyan massacre cover-up, that the media are "in violation of journalistic ethics and standards." Charles Krauthammer writes, with more credibility than I have, that they commit "journalistic malpractice." The Washington Post's endorsement of Obama and two recent columns by Richard Cohen epitomize that phenomenon. Here is a letter I submitted today to The Daily Press, a Tribune paper.  
In a recent column Richard Cohen asked, “could a worse candidate than Michelle Bachmann or Herman Cain” have run for president? While not a supporter of either, I rebutted that Barrack Obama met that criterion. Cohen's column today (30 Oct.) might be interpreted as agreeing with my rebuttal, but ignoring it. He notes a litany of failures, disappointments and inadequacies of President Obama and strangely declares him “not in the mold of RFK.” However, Cohen “will vote for Obama,” his rationale being to “prevent Republicans from …

OBAMA DISQUALIFIERS FOR RE-ELECTION

The way the murders in Libya were, and are being, handled by President Obama and the administration is abhorrant. This is a disqualifier that has been downplayed, not only by Obama and his people, but by the media as well. It's a travesty, and no president who handles such a critical issue as an act of war, which these attacks were and are, should be re-elected to make more similar mistakes and cover-ups. I suppose few will be convinced at this point, but hopefully some will. Those who are more concerned about such singular, non-critical, issues such as same-sex marriage and are ignorant, or dismissive, of the critical conditions of the nation as debt, national security, and much more, will not be swayed. Their eyes are closed, as are their minds. But, hopefully some who want truth and are open to analyzing real information and data so as to make a decison as to what is best for 100% of Americans, not just a few, will be prompted to seek truth and make decisions accordingly. Mr. …

ROMNEY MUST DEFEAT OBAMA -- RESPONSE TO REBUTTAL OF MY ENDORSEMENT OF 19 SEPTEMBER

Rebuttal To a "misguided" rebuttal of my endorsement editorial, "The Case for Romney," published Sept 19, 2012 and posted here Sept 24.
The inaccuracy of Steve Pasco's rebuttal of my September 19 essay delineating reasons Obama should not be reelected was trumped by The Gazette's headline, “Let's Discuss Issues Factually.” My essay is based on fact and honest analysis of Obama's failed policies. But, I agree. Let's talk facts and analyze Pasco's accusations. His essay is highly flawed, disingenuous and misleading.
Pasco's assertion that criticism of the Obama administration's policies indicates hatred of Obama is biased and disingenuous. It's wrong, insulting and a disservice to readers.
I became active in 2008 to lead people here to defeat Obama (and did overwhelmingly here), not because we hated him, but because we loved America. Research into Obama's background revealed that he had less to qualify him than any presidential c…

BISHOP EARL JACKSON -- "An American, not an Arican American"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oi_KaZ53eDg

This is a video I wish all Americans, especially blacks and Progressives who use them, could see. I know Bishop Jackson. The first time I met him and heard him speak he opened the speech with, "I'm Bishop Earl Jackson, I am an American, not an African-American, an American. Bishop is a true patriot. I've had him speak to CARMA group here in my town and have met him several times. I am more impressed each time I see him. He is so courageous and could be the best role model any black person, and others, they could have. It always baffles me to think that blacks vote reflexively for Democrats when the Dems simply use them and count on their vote. Barack Obama is no exception! Please listen to Bishop's message to blacks.

LYING - the dominant word in Obama supporters' vocabulary

This note is to the publisher of The Virginia Gazette that I sent spontaneously after we discussed a rebuttal to an essay and a couple letters from non-thinkers accused me of "half truths," of being disingenuous in telling the truth in a Romney-supporting editorial (published here) of  hatred for Obama. It seems these guys are so accustomed to lying that they think all of us do. It has become the dominant word in their vocabulary and even enhanced after the 1st debate. Honesty is not in their lexicon! More on this in a later post.

I am so damn tired of the lying and other scurrilous behavior that I'm about to go into exile again to finish out life's winter season. I quickly wrote off all Republicans except Romney. While he's not ideal to many, I truly believe he has the management acumen to correct major problems and the character to help us get off what I view seriously as a path to perdition. Even with these thoughts, I believe we may have declined in character…

OBAMA'S PANDERING TO BLACKS WITH FAKE "BLACK/SOUTHERN TALK"

Click here: Conservatives Accuse Obama Of Using Racially Charged Rhetoric In 2007 Speech This video and Huffington Post's way of reporting it as basically a conservative hit piece epitomizes some of the negatives of Obama and how far his sycophantic media will go to protect him from himself. We are in an age where the media, those who have the lodest megaphones and the most access to a non-thinking electorate, are the main electors of the president as well as other major offices. Sadly, it is not likely to stop. It's entirely plausible that an Obama reelection will assure that. A state media a la Venezuela is absolutely possible. By the way, Hugo Chavez just announced his support for Obama. In Latin America, many put Chavez, Castro, Evo Morales, and Carrea in the same pod. Not too far-fetched. This election will elucidate it.

DEATH PANELS NECESSARY -- From an Obama "Czar"

Click here: Obama adviser admits: ‘We need death panels’ For those in denial of what Obamacare will do to ration healthcare, this might be helpful. For those who don't care or just accept the misinformation from the Obama administration and prefer to blindly and thoughtlessly stay on the pathe to perdition, it won't matter. No need to read. I'm sure the Obama shills will hastily counter that the writer, Steve Ratner, is Obama's car czar, not healthcare. I can anticipate their rhetoric before they start delivery.

I.ve hesitated to use the term "death panels" but it is appropos. Obamacare's 15-member advisory council will alocate healthcare.... not just for senior, but for all. Seniors over 70 will be hardest hit.

As one in need of a lung transplant 3+ years ago for survival a few more years, I would surely not be alive under Obamacare. There are a few who oppose my writing who would have preferred that I'd been denied, but I hope there are a few who …